SELECTED SUMMARY DATA

C1. Wetland type: Alkali/Saline Lake Alkali/Saline Pothole/Pond Beaver Dam Complex Bog Depressional Wetland Ephemeral Stream Fen Freshwater Lake Freshwater Pothole/Pond Intermittent Stream Irrigation Canal NC Nonriparian (Upland) Other Perennial Stream Pooled Channel Stream Reservoir River Small Mountain Lake Spring/Seep Area Stock Pond Subterranean Stream Wet Meadow

C2. Polygon size (ac): ; (hect):

C3a. Is the entire polygon an upland: (Yes; No): Yes No

If No, C3b. Does the polygon consist entirely of functional wetland types? (Yes; No): Yes No

C3c. Functional wetland (ac): ; (hect):

C3d. Percent of total polygon:

C4. Does the polygon contain a defined streambank or channel? (Yes; No): Yes No

C5. Channel length (mi): ; (km):

C6. Number of river miles the polygon represents (mi): ; (km):

C7a. Average riparian zone width (ft): ; (m):

C7b. Riparian zone width range (ft): to ; (m): to

C8a. Was the Pfankuch rating used? (Yes; No): Yes No If Yes, C8b. Pfankuch Score:

PROPER FUNCTIONING CONDITION (HEALTH) ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

C9. Polygon Proper Functioning Condition (Health) Assessment

Rating Percent Range	Descriptive Category
80 - 100	Proper Functioning Condition (Healthy)
60 - 79	Functional At Risk (Healthy, but with Problems)
<60	Nonfunctional (Unhealthy)

VEGETATlON DATA

D1a. Wetland prevalence index:

D1b. Vegetation structural diversity: Tall trees; tall shrubs; medium trees/shrubs; herbaceous understory present Tall trees; tall shrubs; herbaceous understory present Tall trees; medium trees/shrubs; herbaceous understory present Tall trees; herbaceous understory present Tall shrubs; medium trees/shrubs; herbaceous understory present Tall shrubs; herbaceous understory present Medium trees/shrubs; herbaceous understory present Tall herbaceous Medium herbaceous Short herbaceous Sparsely vegetated

Trees

D2a. Are trees present? (Yes; No): Yes No

D2b. Tree species by canopy cover class (%) and percent age group (%)

(use 6-letter code) Six Letter Code Database

D6a. Are shrubs present? (Yes; No): Yes No

D6b. Does the polygon have potential for preferred woody species? (Yes; No; NC): Yes No NC

D6c. Shrub species canopy cover(%), age/size groups, and utilization

(use 6-letter code) Six Letter Code Database

D6g. Tree AND shrub removal by other than browse (None (0-5%); Light (6-25%); Moderate (26-50%);
Heavy (>50%); NA; NC): None (0-5%) Light (6-25%) Moderate (26-50%) Heavy (>50%)

D6h. Basis of call:

Graminoids

D7. Graminoids present? (Yes No): Yes No

(use 6-letter code) Six Letter Code Database

Forbs

D8. Forbs present? (Yes; No): Yes No

(use 6-letter code) Six Letter Code Database

D9. Plant Group by Canopy Cover (%)

D10. Total canopy cover (%) by lifeform:

D11. Total canopy cover (%) by woody species:

D12. Total canopy cover (%) by all plant lifeforms:

Weed Data

D13a. Are invasive weeds present? (Yes; No; NC): Yes No NC

If Yes, D13b. Enter the canopy cover and the density/distribution class for each of the following invasive species:bluebuttons:

D14a. Are undesirable herbaceous species present? (Yes; No; NC): Yes No NC (Not collected prior to 1991)

If Yes. D14b. Record the combined canopy cover (%) of all undesirable herbaceous species observed:

D15. Habitat Types (HT) and Community Types (CT) (use 6-letter code) HT/CT Database

D16. Polygon trend: Improving, Degrading, Static, or Status Unknown? Improving Degrading Static Status Unknown

D17. Explain trend description and give other vegetation comments:

WATER QUALlTY DATA

E1. Waterbody number:

E2a. Is the waterbody a 303(d) listed impaired stream? (Yes; No) Yes No

If Yes, E2b. Year of listing? 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990

E3. Waterbody TMDL priority:

E4. TMDL development status:

E5. Probable cause(s):

E6. Probable impaired uses:

E7. Probable source(s):

PHYSlCAL SlTE DATA

F1. Does the polygon contain a stream bank or channel bottom? (Yes; No; NC): Yes No NC If No, go to item F17a.

F2a. Is the channel bottom visible? (Yes; No; NC): Yes No NC (Not collected prior to 1990, and part of 1991)

If Yes, F2b. Give the percent of each size (must approx. 100%):

F3a. Are bank materials present? (Yes; No; NC): Yes No NC (Not collected prior to 1990, and part of 1991)

If Yes, F3b. Give the percent of each size (must approx. 100%):

F4a. Is there active lateral cutting of stream? (Yes; No; NC): Yes No NC

If Yes, F4b. How much of the stream length displays active lateral cutting (%):

F5. Percent of the total bank length unstable (0-5%; 6-25%; 26-45%; over 45%; NC): 0-5% 6-25% 26-45% over 45% NC

F6a. Is the streambank altered by on-site human activities? (Yes; No; NC): Yes No NC (Not collected prior to 1991)

If Yes, F6b. Percent (%) of the bank length that has human-caused alterations?

F6c. Of this, how much resulted from: (must approx. 100%)

F6d. Distribute the total streambank alteration among these kinds: (must approx. 100%)

F7. Percent of the streambanks with deep, binding root mass (0-35%; 36-65%; 66-85%; over 85%; NC): 0-35% 36-65% 66-85% over 85% NC

F8. Percent of polygon with sufficient fine material to hold water and act as a rooting medium (0-35%; 36-65%; 66-85%; over 85%; NC): 0-35% 36-65% 66-85% over 85% NC (Not collected prior to 1990, and part of 1991)

F9. Rosgen stream types recorded and the percent of the stream length accounted for by each:

F10a. Do available maps accurately represent the sinuosity of the stream? (Yes; No; NA; NC): Yes No NA NC

If No, F10b. Determine sinuosity in the field; If Yes, determine sinuosity in the office from topo map:

F11. Average non-vegetated stream channel width: (ft) ; (m) : (Not collected prior to 1989)

F12. Stream gradient (percent):

F13a. Active downcutting of the stream? (Yes; No; NC): Yes No NC If Yes, F13b. Percent (%) of stream actively downcutting:

F14a. Headcuts present? (Yes; No; NC): Yes No NC If Yes, F14b. Number of headcuts:

F14c. Average headcut height (ft): F14d. Location of headcut(s):

F15a. Is the stream channel braided (has multiple active channels during normal flows)? (Yes; No; NC): Yes No NC

If Yes, F15b. Percent of the stream channel that is braided: (Not collected prior to 1991)

F16. Indicate the best description of channel incisement (None, Slight, Moderate, Severe): None Slight Moderate Severe (Not collected prior to 1990)

F17a. Is there exposed soil surface (bare ground)? (Yes; No; NC): Yes No NC If No or NC, go to item F19.

F17b. Percent (%) of the polygon which is exposed soil surface (bare ground):

F17c. Of this, how much is due to Natural Processes: Human-caused disturbance: (must approx.100%)

F17d. Within each category (natural and human-caused), how much resulted from the listed processes?

F19. Are channel point bars revegetating? (Yes; No; NA; NC): Yes No NA NC

F20a. Are side drainages and hillslopes contributing to degradation of the system? (Yes; No; NA; NC): Yes No NA NC

If Yes, F20b. Human-caused? (Yes; No; NA; NC): Yes No NA NC Causes:

F20c. Natural cause? (Yes; No; NA; NC): Yes No NA NC

Major soil parent material:

F21. Is there a nearby source on the system for large woody debris to enter the stream? (Yes; No; NA; NC): Yes No NA NC

F22. Is the average riparian zone widening? (Yes; No; NA; NC): Yes No NA NC

F23. Sinuosity, width/depth ratio, and gradient are in balance with the landscape setting? (Yes; No; NA; NC): Yes No NA NC

F24a. Is the polygon away from the streambank physically altered(Yes; No; NA; NC): Yes No NA NC If Yes, F24b. What Percent:

F24c. Of this, how much resulted from these causes: (must approx. 100%)

F24d. Distribute the total polygon non-streambank alteration among these kinds: (must approx. 100%)

F25a. Percent (%) of polygon affected with hummocks/pugging:

F25b. Distribution of hummocks/pugging: Within streambanks: Remainder of polygon: (must approx.100%)

F26a. Are seeps or springs present? (Yes; No; NC): Yes No NC ( Not collected prior to 1993)

If Yes, F26b. Number of seeps and springs:

F26c. How many springs and seeps had hummocks and/or pugging in 25% or more of the wetted area?

F26d. Location of the springs and seeps:

F27a. Is wetland type a pooled channel of an intermittent stream (item C1)? (Yes; No; NC): Yes No NC (Not collected prior to 1991)

If Yes, F27b. Percent of the channel length with pooled water:

F27c. Is this pooled water expected to remain at the surface through the remainder of the growing season? (Yes; No): Yes No

F27d. Location of the pools:

F28a. Is there evidence of beaver in the polygon? (Yes; No; NC): Yes No NC (Not collected prior to 1992 and most of 1993)

If Yes, F27b. (Active; Inactive): Active Inactive

F28c. Describe the type and amounts of beaver activity observed:

F27d. Number of beaver dams and lodges observed:

F28e. Level of beaver activity (number of stems chewed). (1-25; 26-100; over 100; NC): 1-25 26-100 over 100 NC

F28f. How many beavers were observed? Where?

F29. Comments (Summarize unique characteristics or problems not evident from the data collected. Include topics related to any of the optional data. Consider current and historic attributes resulting from human-caused and natural processes.):

F30. Detailed description of upper and lower ends of the polygon:

PHOTOGRAPH DATA

G1a. Identification of photos (taken at the upstream end of polygon): Roll No.: Photographer:

Photo numbers: (upstream): (downstream): (others):

G1b. Location of "other" photos:

Glc. Description of views (upstream): (downstream): (others):

G2a. Is there an adjacent polygon upstream of this polygon? (Yes; No): Yes No

G2b. Is there an adjacent polygon downstream of this polygon? (Yes; No): Yes No

G3a. Identification of photos (taken at downstream end of polygon): Roll Number: Photographer:

Photo numbers: (upstream): (downstream): (others):

G3b. Location of "other" photos:

G3c. Description of views (upstream): (downstream): (others):

G4. Film and Camera Specifications

Film brand: Digital Kodak Elite Kodak Kodachrome Film speed (ASA): Lens diameter (mm):

Lens focal length (mm):

OPTIONAL DATA

H1. Aspect:

H2. Vegetative use by animals (0-25%; 26-50%; 51-75%; 76-100%): 0-25% 26-50% 51-75% 76-100%

H3. Adjacent uplands (Agriculture; Grassland; Shrubland; Forest; or Other): Agriculture Grassland Shrubland Forest Other Agriculture Grassland Shrubland Forest Other

H4a. Were Category 2 (threatened and endangered) plant species observed? (Yes; No): Yes No

If Yes, H4b. Species:

H4c. Location(s):

H5a. Do subsurface water supplies, independent of flowing surface water in the area, appear to influence area vegetation? (An example of this is a hardwood draw with riparian vegetation, but rarely flowing surface water.) (Yes; No): Yes No

If Yes, H5b. Describe the situation:

H6. Bankfull width/depth ratio:

H7. Entrenchment ratio (floodprone width/bankfull width) (less than 1.4; 1.4-2.2; greater than 2.2): less than 1.4 1.4-2.2 greater than 2.2

H8. Distribution of exposed soil surface (item F17b) (must approx. 100%):

Inside/outside the bank/channel area: Inside: Outside:

H9. Percent of streambank accessible to livestock:

H10a. Has the bank configuration or channel profile been modified by construction? (Yes; No; NC): Yes No NC

If Yes, H10b. How much of the bank or channel length is modified (%)?

H10c. What part resulted from the various sources: (must approx.100%)

H10d. Location(s):

H10e. If human-caused channel modifications are present, are they stable? (Stable; Unstable): Stable Unstable

H10f. What is the effect of the modifications on the immediate and downstream channel?

Waterfowl Data

H11a. Were waterfowl nests or broods observed? (Yes; No: NC): Yes No NC If Yes, H11b. Describe:

Fishery Data

H12a. Does the polygon contain a fishery? (Yes; No; Unknown): Yes No Unknown

If Yes, H12b. Is it a sport fishery, non-sport fishery, or unknown: Sport Fishery Non-Sport Fishery Unknown

H12c. Fish types present, if known (use common names or descriptions):

H12d. How many fish were observed? (0; 1 -10; 11 -50; greater than 50): 0 1-10 11-50 greater than 50

H12e. If the polygon does not contain a fishery, is there potential for one? (Yes; No; Unknown): Yes No Unknown

Explain:

Amphibian and Reptile Data

H13a. Were amphibians observed? (Yes; No; NC): Yes No NC

If Yes, H13b. Number observed: Frogs: Toads: Salamanders:

H14a. Were reptiles observed? (Yes; No; NC): Yes No NC

If Yes, H14b. Number observed: Snakes: Turtles: Lizards:

H15. List amphibian or reptile species and the quantity of each identified in the polygon.

Threatened and Endangered Species Data

H16a. Were threatened and endangered animal species observed? (Yes; No; NC): Yes No NC

If Yes, H16b. What species? Peregrine Falcon: Bald Eagle: Bull Trout:

Peregrine Falcon Nest: Bald Eagle Nest:

H16c. Other species observed?

H16d. Location in polygon where threatened and endangered animals or nests were sighted: